Rolling Stone Magazine
Feb. 18, 1982 pp. 10-13
(from stevemartin.net)
Steve Martin Sings: The Rolling
Stone Interview
"So I wanted everything
to cease, and I wanted to throw the dice." Steve Martin, overdosed on
success, threw his dice and what a number he rolled: the lead in "Pennies
from Heaven." In this MGM tragi‑musical, which zigzags from doomed
darkness to dreamy fantasies, Martin plays Arthur Parker, a song‑sheet
salesman, who lies and cheats, sings and dances ‑ who does just about
everything, in fact, but act funny. For a man who rose to stardom through
comedy, he was clearly taking the biggest risk of his career.
It was a
role Martin worked hard to get. He had to learn dramatic acting ‑ from the
director, Herbert Ross ‑ and take tap‑dancing lessons for months, well
into the production of the film. He had to accept what amounted to a
year's retirement from, to put it mildly, a wildly successful comedy
career. And he even had to butt up against his own friend and manager,
Bill McEuen. "I just think he shouldn't be doing a dramatic role at this
point," McEuen said, a few weeks before the movie opened. "I would've been
happier if he'd done a couple of more comedies first, then tried something
different."
But Steve
would not be stopped. Martin had seen "Pennies" in its original form, as a
six‑part, nine‑hour television series produced by the BBC in 1976 and
shown later in the United States on various PBS stations. "I couldn't
believe it," Martin said. "I'll sit there and go, 'This is the greatest
thing I've ever seen.' What the movie's about is so common to everything.
Arthur's desire to be everything was so simple. You loved her, you got
her, you lost her. Pop music now, or in the Sixties, was complicated, but
these songs were just, "Here's what life is gonna be.' And that
promise has been made to people of our generation as well as to people of
Arthur's generation."
Ten days after "Pennies" opened,
Martin's mood was a reflection of the film's business ‑ a mixture of
disappointment, optimism and caution. Backed by rave reviews, it did well
in New York City, but elsewhere, reviews were mixed and business was
so‑so. "I'm disappointed that it didn't open as a blockbuster," said
Martin, "and I don't know what to blame, other than it's me and not a
comedy." About the critics? "I must say that the people who get the movie,
in general, have been wise and intelligent; the people who don't get it
are ignorant scum."
When Martin
got the role in "Pennies," he was thirty‑six years old and the hottest
comedian in the country. His concerts competed with large rock shows,
drawing audiences of 25,000 people. Two albums sold more than a million
copies each, and a third had the million‑selling single "King Tut." He
played Vegas and published a best‑selling book, "Cruel Shoes." All four of
his NBC specials have given that beleaguered network something to smile
about. And his first full‑length feature film, "The Jerk," grossed $100
million on an investment of some $4.5 million. In fact, it was on the
strength of "The Jerk" that Martin was mentioned as a possible Arthur
Parker when Herbert Ross began casting "Pennies." Several other actors,
among them Al Pachino and Richard Dreyfuss, were sent scripts. But Rock
McCallum, executive producer of "Pennies," says most of the actors were
put off by the "unsympathetic" nature of the Parker character and by the
work the part required.
When Martin
met with Ross and writer Dennis Potter at Martin's home in Beverly Hills,
Potter recalls: "Steve started talking about Arthur, what he felt about
the part. As he talks ‑ he actually put on a hat and did a tentative dance
‑ he instinctively understood Arthur, and from that moment on, I had no
doubt." Ross, who got into film as a choreographer and has directed a few
dancers ("The Turning Point" and "Nijinsky" being among his credits),
calls Martin "literally the only actor in Hollywood who is equipped to do
a musical. There is not one actor who has the skills that he does."
We are at
Martin's house in Beverly Hills. From the outside, it looks like a
forbidding fortress. But inside, it's sunlit, wide‑open spaces, all white
walls (or, more often, half walls or columns with rectangular cutouts) and
gray carpeting, with careful, tasteful and clearly professional
decorating. Furnishings are mostly contemporary, in greens, roses and
maroons. Bookshelves are filled with a substantial library of histories
and collections of American art (there are two dozen books on James
McNeill Whistler alone), along with leather‑bound scripts from Martin's
films and TV specials. It is a house with no clutter, no magazines on the
coffee table, no records strewn about (in a cabinet, though, one finds
albums by Steely Dan, Kraftwerk, Devo, Mozart and tapes of Thirties
music). On the walls hang artwork, both modern and nineteenth century,
including a John Henry Twachtman. Martin has been a serious "looker" since
college days and a collector since he could afford to be one.
Offstage,
with friends or strangers, Steve is, simply, off. He's a cooperative
interview, but he doesn't want to talk about fellow comedians, he says,
"because all I'm going to say is nice things, and it's going to be so
boring." He wants to keep his relationship with Bernadette Peters (costar
of "Pennies") private. And the same goes for his art collection. Agonizing
over whether to even talk about it, he explains: "As a comedian, I'm
willing to trade out my private thoughts about things that are personal to
me for space in the magazine, and I'm willing to say dumb things that, six
months later, I go, "Why did I say that?" But when it comes to art, which
is so personal ‑ and I'm trying to make it part of my personality ‑ I'm
not willing to say dumb things about it. I want the freedom to be stupid
about it, to learn about it, to think about something I still don't
understand. It's like why I'm a vegetarian, I don't know. I can't defend
myself, and I don't have to defend myself. It's like the artist doesn't
have to explain or justify anything about it. And I think it's important
for me to keep that position, for my own personal health.
But on
occasion, Martin the comedian emerges. He notices my scribbling into a
notebook. "What're you writing down?" he asks.
I tell him,
"Striped dress shirt, black slacks...."
"Well," he
volunteers, "my shoes are mauve. They're dress shoes, but I want to break
them in, so I'm wearing them two hours a day." He chuckles.
And the
socks?
"Oh, I'm breaking in these socks,
too."
Why did
you decide to take such a risk with your career?
I was asked about that before I went
into the project, and there was no hesitation. When I first started doing
my act, it was not...normal. It was not what was expected. That's what the
public caught onto. And I said, "If I start getting trapped by my own
sameness, I'm not doing what they secretly want, which is for me to do
what I want to do."
The last
time saw you, you said this movie would be the biggest challenge of your
life. Did your expectation come true?
More than I
thought, I was in such a state. I'd been on the road ‑ about seventeen
years. But three years really steady, and it was debilitating. You get
physically tired, emotionally tired, and start wondering what you're
doing.
It got to the
point where when I'd do new material, it sounded like old material even to
me [puzzled laugh]. And one thing I didn't understand that frustrated me
was, I was doing comedy and the audience was doing an event. They were at
an event, and I was going, "Wait a minute. This is my little joke. Why are
you waving balloons at me during my joke?"
I needed a
break. I wasn't looking for a dramatic role; I didn't know what I was
looking for. Then this thing came along, and it was like seeing the
perfect circle. You knew you had to enter it.
After the
first weeks of shooting, did you feel confident about your acting, or was
there fear?
[Laughs] I
would not allow myself to be afraid. I thought that would really hurt me.
I felt I had been through so much. I'd faced 20,000 people in concert, and
I refused to be intimidated. I was not easy.
There's
something about the movie that overwhelms me, and it's touching and it's
different and I love what it's saying, even though I can't express it.
When I was in college ‑ one reason I was in show business is I'd read a
poem and think, "God, that thing is beautiful." And I would get in my
speech class and read the poem. I wanted to pass it along. The thrill for
me is when a sympathetic person watches this film and gets the same
feeling I had when I was the BBC version.
Was your
goal always to be in movies?
Yeah,
stand‑up comedy was really just an accident. I was figuring out a way to
get onstage. I made up a magic act and, "Hey, I'm in show business," and
that led to nightclubs. I felt like a comedian, that was my work. As I got
into the movies, I was reminded, "Hey, this is really why I got into show
business." I do like the movies. It's so condensed. You get to try and
make it right.
But
there's nothing more condensed than a one‑liner to an audience that
laughts right back.
But with
movies you've got constantly new material, constant new challenges.
Wasn't it
in college (Long Beach State, 1964) that you hit on your particular brand
of comedy?
College
totally changed my life. It changed what I believe and what I think about
everything. I majored in philosophy. Something about non sequiturs
appealed to me. I philosophy I started studying logic, and they were
talking about cause and effect, and you start to realize, "Hey, there is
no cause and effect! There is no logic! There is no anything!" Then it
gets real easy to write this stuff, because all you have to do is twist
everything hard ‑ you twist the punch line, you twist the non sequitur so
hard away from the things that set I up, that it's easy... and it's
thrilling.
For a
while there, you thought about becoming a teacher.
But then I
though, "I can't give up show business." I'd studied philosophy and
realized the only true value was accomplishment. So I changed my major,
transferred [to UCLA] and went into theater.
You were already doing
some comedy. Where did you first perform onstage?
At this club,
the Prison of Socrates, on Balboa Island [near Newport Beach]. It was Hoot
Night, and I got up and just threw everything in to try and get fifteen
minutes. So I had my magic, and I read poetry and played the banjo, and I
juggled. It's exactly what I'm doing now.
What kind of a response
did you get?
Gosh, I don't
know. Part of the things, when you're young and naïve, is that you think
you went over when you didn't, and that's what keeps you going. Your
desire's so great to do it, you don't just quit.
How did you meet your
manager, Bill McEuen?
Well, I used
to go to high school with his brother, John, and we slowly communicated.
We didn't get together, thought, till I started writing for the Smothers
Brothers. I was about twenty‑two when we decided to sign a management
thing, and neither of us, I swear to God, knew what we were doing.
[Dumbstruck voice] "I got a manager now...." I can't believe the intensity
of his devotion. He tape‑recorded everything you did back in the early
days. Sure. He used to sit out there every night, watch every show, and
laugh. And I'd hear his laugh and it's sort of keep[ me going. It was like
him and me, kind of cheering each other up. I know I'm dying, he knows I'm
dying, and we're laughing about it. For a while you slipped into a hippie
look.
How much did it reflect your life?
Well, I was
just going through a stage, like anybody. I was listening to rock music. I
smoked some marijuana. That was when I was about twenty. Marijuana's so
strange in that you can get a lot of different things from it. When you
first start smoking it, you get really high, and then after a while, you
just get tired. When I started writing, I quit.
How did you get the job
writing for the Smothers Brothers?
I had a
written a stack of things in college, in creative writing class. I had a
girlfriend who was a dancer on the show, and she showed Mason Williams
[the show's head writer] my stuff. Mason paid me out of his own pocked at
first. After your hippie phase, around 1971.
You
started wearing white suits. How contrived was that?
It seemed at
the time like something really far out. It was planned, and then the white
suit became gurulike when I started achieving success. But when I cut my
hair, I didn't do it to think, "Well, this will help me out in show
business." I just wanted to forget about the past. Even before the white
suit, you were doing some strange things, not only in your act but
especially after the shows, leading crowds out into the streets and going
to McDonald's and ordering 300 hamburgers and one French fry. That's what
I had to learn in acting, that it was the degree of your commitment to an
idea that made it successful or not. The idea could be wrong, but you must
be committed, and that's what I was to the act at the time. All the way. I
remember the first time I ever walked out of the hall at the end of the
act, and the audience came with me and I had them all get in a swimming
pool ‑ which was empty ‑ and then I swam over top to them, and they all
put their arms out, and I thought, "Gee, there's a breakthrough! I'm gonna
do this every time now." I was that spirit, I think, that caught fire to
the rest of my act. I stopped going outside because it got too dangerous.
I realized if I go out and take 3000 people someone's gonna get run over.
That's when the concerts become "events." But even after that, they were
great shows, shows that thrilled me. It was like playing an instrument.
The audience was an instrument. I can do this and they'll do this. There
was a periods of, like, a year and a half where I felt so good; my body,
my fingers, everything was working. When it got beyond that....I don't
want sour grapes, like I was selling out 20,000‑seat concerts and was
unhappy. I wasn't on one hand. It was the traveling, the circumstances ‑
it just got me. I started doing things like collapsing onstage. It was a
signal.
What about
the time you had to go the hospital?
It was a
concert in Knoxville, Tennessee, with about 7000 people in, like, a
gymnasium. They were hanging from the rafters. It was about 100 degrees
outside and humid, so it must've been 125 degrees onstage. The first five
minutes I could feel sweat coming from my hair and running down my face.
And the suit got soaked through. And I was about a half‑hour into the act
when I realized I couldn't go on. I had to leave. They called the medics
and took me to the hospital. It was just exhaustion. I was a wreck.
How did it
affect your performance? Did your act become rote?
No, that
wasn't the problem. My act was always formulated. It's not like you get
depressed and go out and do a lousy show. You could be exhausted, and
something happens and you're on top of it. That's the enigma of
performing. You can be very down and go out there and suddenly feel it. Or
be very high and never connect with the audience. I started getting tired
when I was getting into the nonconcert situations, like Atlantic City or
Las Vegas. I felt something was missing.
When you
began to get a lot of media attention, people tried to explain why you hit
when you did. Did you agree with their assessments?
You know, in
those articles, I always looked for something larger. I always felt there
was a deeper meaning to what I was doing than just being "wild and crazy,"
something more philosophical. I had a view that there was something funny
about trying to be funny. I needed a theory behind it in order to justify
it at the time, but now I don't. I see it for what it was. It was just
fun, and it was stupid and that's why it was successful. But a lot of
stupid comics have failed.
Why did
you succeed?
It was like
everyone was ripe, and I was there and had the act I'd been doing for ten
years, and boom, you know? I just think people wanted something new. I
mean, I wanted something new, so I sort of became it. You were one the
most popular guest hosts of "Saturday Night Live."
Was there
an instant chemistry?
It grew over
the years. After a couple of times, it was a lot easier to write for me,
and we had things to go to. I was not much of a contributor, except for my
monologues.
When you
were invited onto "SNL," did you already know the show?
Sure, I saw the very first show, and I loved it. Saturday Night Live was a
huge force. It made movie stars ‑ John Belushi, Dan Aykroyd, Bill Murray.
They and Richard Pryor and Lily Tomlin and myself were the comedy of the
Seventies.
Do you
have plans to work with "SNL" case members in movies?
Oh, I'd love to. We had a project at one point with me, Belushi, and
Aykroyd, called The Three Caballeros, but it went the way of a lot of
projects. Belushi and Aykroyd and Murray and Laraine [Newman] came on my
special [November 25th, 1981, on NBC]. There's a nice camaraderie, but
we're not the best friends. Belushi was over here the other night with Don
Novello [Father Guido Sarducci], and we sat around, talked and
bullshitted. That was fun. You don't get a chance to get real close
because... "I'm off!" or they're gone. You know, you really see each other
only at rehearsals.
Do you
plan to get back to the stage soon?